EFTA00028880.pdf

Type

pdf

Source set

data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
v. 
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, 
Defendant. 
20 Cr. 330 (AJN) 
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL 
IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION TO DISMISS THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT 
FOR BREACH OF THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT 
Christian R. Everdell 
COHEN & GRESSER LLP 
Phone: 
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca 
Laura A. Menninger 
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 
Phone: 
Bobbi C. Stemheim 
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 
Phone: 
Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell 
EFTA00028880


TABLE OF CONTENTS 
Page 
I. 
The NPA Applies to Ms. Maxwell, and She Has Standing to Enforce It. 
 2 
II. 
The Co-Conspirator Immunity Provision is Not Limited to the SDFL. 
7 
III. 
The Co-Conspirator Immunity Provision Is Not Limited to the 2001-07 Time 
Period or to Violations of Specific Statutes 
 13 
IV. 
In the Alternative, the Court Should Conduct Discovery and an Evidentiary Hearing 
Regarding the Parties' Intent. 
 16 
CONCLUSION 
18 
EFTA00028881


TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 
Page(s) 
Cases 
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Mortg. Capital, Inc., 
821 F.3d 297 (2d Cir. 2016) 
8, 9 
Collins v. Univ. of Notre Dame DU Lac, 
929 F.3d 830 (7th Cir. 2019) 
8, 9 
Penncro Assocs., Inc. v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., 
499 F.3d 1151 (10th Cir. 2007) 
8, 9 
United States v. Aleman, 
286 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2002) 
17 
United States v. Annabi, 
771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985) 
passim 
United States v. CFW Const. Co., 
583 F. Supp. 197 (D.S.C. 1984), of d, 749 F.2d 33 (4'h Cir. 1984) 
6 
United States v. El-Sadig, 
133 F. Supp. 2d 600 (N.D. Ohio 2001) 
3, 6 
United States v. Feldman, 
939 F.3d 182 (2d Cir. 2019) 
5, 6, 10, 17 
United States v. Florida West Intl Airways, Inc., 
853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 
3, 4, 6 
United States v. Gebbie, 
294 F.3d 540 (3d Cir. 2002) 
12 
United States v. Gonzalez, 
93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004) 
8 
United States v. Harvey, 
791 F.2d 294 (4th Cir. 1986) 
 12 
United States v. Mariamma Viju (01), 
No. 3:1…

Open in the interactive archive →