EFTA00028850.pdf
- Type
- pdf
- Source set
- data-set-8
Original source
Extracted text
EXHIBIT B
EFTA00028850
App.-0805
G4LMGIUC
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
3
4
Plaintiff,
5
v.
6
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
7
Defendant.
8
9
x
x
15 Civ. 7433 (RWS)
New York, N.Y.
April 21, 2016
11:05 a.m.
10
Before:
11
HON. ROBERT W. SWEET,
12
District Judge
13
APPEARANCES
14
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BY: SIGRID STONE McCAWLEY
16
-and-
FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.
17
BY: BRAD EDWARDS
-and-
18
PAUL G. CASSELL
19
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
20
BY: LAURA A. MENNINGER
JEFF PAGLUICA
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
EFTA00028851
App.-0806
2
G4LMGIUC
1
(Case called)
2
THE COURT: Welcome back. I have read the papers.
3
Who knows. I might have missed something, but I think I've got
4
it fairly well under control. I would be pleased to hear
5
anything anybody wants to tell me in addition to what you've
6
already given me.
7
MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, this is Sigrid McCawley. I
8
would like to start, if it's convenient with the Court, with
9
the pro hac vice motions that are pending because we would like
10
counsel to be able to anticipate in these proceedings. Would
11
that be all right if I started with that?
12
THE COURT: I don't care.
13
MS. McCAWLEY: Thank you. Your Honor, you have before
14
you two pro hac vice motions. My client,
15
would like to have counsel of record in the case be added as
16
Professor Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards. We have presented
17
those pro hacs to your Honor. This is the first time in my
18
years of practice that I've had a contested one, so I've looked
19
at the case law surrounding that and I think it is very clear
20
that a client is entitled to counsel of choice in a case.
21
In this matter she has selected these lawyers. They
22
have been working with her. They had been working on this
23
matter for many months now. …
Open in the interactive archive →