Epstein Project

EFTA00028055.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

Caseas212-6r310193MACINnEEIVANN95202QIERVON0:37217a Fab efi5of 5 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
United States of America, 
Ghislaine Maxwell, 
Defendant. 
USDC SONY 
DOCUMENT 
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 
DOC  
DATE FILED: 9/2/20 
20-CR-330 (AJN) 
MEMORANDUM 
OPINION AND ORDER 
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: 
On August 17, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a sealed letter motion seeking 
an Order modifying the protective order in this case.' Specifically, she sought a Court order 
allowing her to file under seal in certain civil cases ("Civil Cases") materials ("Documents") that 
she received in discovery from the Government in this case. She also sought permission to 
I This Order will not refer to any redacted or othenvise confidential information, and as a result it will not be sealed. 
The Court will adopt the redactions to Defendant's August 17, 2020 letter motion that the Government proposed on 
August 21, 2020, and it will enter that version into the public docket. The Court's decision to adopt the 
Government's proposed redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. 
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the 
documents in question are "judicial documents;" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to 
the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 119-20. "Such 
countervailing factors include but are not limited to 'the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' 
and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 
1048 (2d Cir.1995) ("Amodeo II")). The Government's proposed redactions satisfy this test. First, the Court finds 
that the defendant's letter motion is "relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial 
process," t…

Open in the interactive archive →