EFTA00027884.pdf
- Type
- pdf
- Source set
- data-set-8
Original source
Extracted text
JCB3DOEC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
x
JANE DOE,
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiff,
New York, N.Y.
v.
DARREN K. INDYKE, et al.,
Defendants.
Before:
19 CV 8673 (KPF)
x
Conference
December 11, 2019
11:30 a.m.
HON. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA,
District Judge
APPEARANCES
KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BY: ROBERTA KAPLAN
ALEXANDRA CONLON
KATE L. DONIGER
LOUIS FISHER
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
BY: BENNET J. MOSKOWITZ
CHARLES GLOVER
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
EFTA00027884
JCB3DOEC
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
THE DEPUTY CLERK: In the matter of Doe v. Indyke.
Counsel, please state your name for the record beginning with
plaintiff.
MS. KAPLAN: Good morning. Roberta Kaplan for
plaintiff from Kaplan Hecker & Fink. I am here with my
colleagues Kate Doniger, Alex Conlon, and Louis Fisher.
THE COURT: Good morning.
MR. MOSKOWITZ: Good morning. Bennet Moskowitz,
Troutman Sanders LLP, counsel for the co-executors of the
Estate of Jeffrey D. Epstein.
MR. GLOVER: And Charles Glover of the same firm.
THE COURT: First of all, I thank you very much for
your indulgence. As you could see, we did not know until we
knew that plaintiff in our prior case did not speak English.
He was comfortable with the dates of a conference and not more
than that. So I appreciate your patience.
Let me begin by noting that I'm surprised we are
having this conference, even though I am the one who convened
it. And that is because what I thought made sense from an
efficiency perspective was to have the discovery assigned to a
single magistrate judge, and which is what was done. The
reason that I'm having this conference, and Judge Freeman is
not, is it does not appear that the discussion of motions to
strike or motion practice is occurring in all of the cases.
And so for those in…
Open in the interactive archive →