EFTA00027244.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: data-set-8
Extracted text

From: 
To:" 
)" 
 
Subject: RE: RE: 
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:28:26 +0000 
(USANYS)" 
 
Okay, thanks. 
From: 
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 4:58 PM 
To: 
(USANYS) 
Subject: FW: RE: 
FYI 
From: 
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 16:57 
To: Brown, Jeffrey 
Subject: RE: RE: 
Jeff, 
The reference to not seeking a response from Governor Richardson at this time about current allegations is correct, and I 
believe accurately conveys what I said on the phone. What I think remains inaccurate is the statement that I said he was 
neither a target, subject, or witness in the case — in response to your question about his status, what I said was that in the 
general sense, anyone who we don't have reason to know has no exposure (witness), or believe does have exposure 
(target), would be a subject, and that specifically with respect to Governor Richardson, we do not currently intend to 
subpoena or request to speak with him based on our investigation at this time. That's directly from my contemporaneous 
notes. I think you could reasonably infer from my description that we don't currently consider him a witness or target, 
but I don't think it's accurate to infer or interpret from my description on Sunday of the three categories that Governor 
Richardson is in none of them. If you had asked me to specifically place Governor Richardson in one of those categories, 
separate from a general description, I would have, and if that would be useful now, I can; similarly, if it would be useful for 
me to give you our specific view on just whether he is currently a target, I can do that. 
With respect to the quote, I don't have a view on anyone expressing their own personal inferences, and I recognize the 
revision that limits the view to this particular moment in the investigation; that said, I expect that if asked whether the 
Office in fact does believe at this time that the Governor did not participate in or witness the alleged criminal activity by 
Jeffrey Epstein, we likely would …
Open in the interactive archive →