EFTA00027052.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: data-set-8
Extracted text

From: " 
To:" 
Cc: " 
, 
Subject: RE: US v. Epstein 
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 20:13:00 +0000 
Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg 
Yes, please exclude the "Junk Search Terms (From)" hits from the responsiveness search. Once the search for the 
responsiveness terms are run, please save the search so that we can take a look. I do not expect we will ask to batch 
these out. 
Thanks, 
From: 
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 3:55 PM 
To: 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: US v. Epstein 
I am assuming that when we run the responsiveness terms and e-mail addresses we are excluding the junk documents 
correct? Also, once the search for the responsiveness terms are run what do you want to do with the documents? Will 
you be conducting a review and will I need to batch these documents out for you? 
From: 
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 3:41 PM 
To: 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: US v. Epstein 
Thanks =. 
I think we'd like to scrap this second search entirely. So please only keep the first search entitled "Epstein —
Junk Search Terms (From)" and tag those hits as junk. Please run the responsiveness search terms on all of the remaining 
documents. 
From: 
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 3:11 PM 
To: 
Cc: 
>; 
Subject: RE: US v. Epstein 
The searches were run on the e-mails and the attachments. Do you not want the searches run on the full families? 
EFTA00027052


From: 
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 3:06 PM 
To: 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: US v. Epstein 
I've reviewed the searched in US v. Epstein (SW). The search entitled "Epstein — Junk Search Terms (From)" looks 
good to me. Please tag all of those as junk. 
The search entitled "Epstein — Junk Search Terms (Keywords)" seems to have caught up a number of documents that are 
not junk and appear responsive to the warrant. It's not clear to me why that happened—the ones I'm seeing don't 
appear to have any of the keywords on the attached list. Is there a reason that would be? Also, I realized that this search 
caught up a number of non-email documents. Wo…
Open in the interactive archive →