Epstein Project

EFTA00026750.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 33 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 7 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of New York 
The Silvio J. Mao Building 
One Saint Andrew's Plaza 
New York. New York 10007 
July 28, 2020 
VIA ECF 
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan 
United States District Court 
Southern District of New York 
United States Courthouse 
40 Foley Square 
New York, New York 10007 
Re: 
United States v. Gleislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) 
Dear Judge Nathan: 
The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be 
entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of 
July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense 
counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between 
July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense 
counsel have come to an agreement on much of the proposed protective order. However, the 
parties disagree as to two inclusions sought by the defendant which the Government objects to and 
for which, as detailed herein, the Government submits there is no legal basis. Accordingly, the 
Government respectfully requests that the Court enter its proposed protective order (the 
"Government Proposed Order"), which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and which differs from the 
defendant's proposed order in those two respects, as further described below. 
A. 
The Defendant's Request to be Permitted to Publicly Name and Identify Victims 
As detailed herein, the Government seeks to protect the identities of victims, consistent 
with their significant privacy interests and the well-established law in this Circuit, and proposes a 
protective order consistent with those very significant interests. In contrast, the defendant insists 
that the protective order be modified such that she and her counsel would be permitted to "publicly 
re…

Open in the interactive archive →