Epstein Project

EFTA00023488.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

Case 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF Document 118 Filed 02/10/21 Page 1 of 6 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
X 
Plaintiff, 
19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) 
-against-
DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : 
of the Estate ofJeffkey Edward Epstein, et al., 
Defendants. 
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: 
X 
OPINION AND 
ORDER 
On January 21, 2021, Plaintiff 
filed I motion to dismiss this action with 
prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 411)(2). In connection with her motion, 
Plaintiff filed' proposed order of dismissal imposing certain conditions (the "Proposed Order"). 
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following reasons, subject to 
Plaintiff's consent, dismissal is granted pursuant to the terms of the Proposed Order modified as 
described below. 
I. 
BACKGROUND 
On November 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed 
I
 
Complaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants 
Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their official capacities as appointed executors of the 
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") (Indyke and Kahn together, the "Co-Executors"). The 
Complaint alleges claims of battery, false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional 
distress under New York law. These claims stem from and/or arise in connection with Mr. 
EFTA00023488


Case 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF Document 118 Filed 02/10/21 Page 2 of 6 
Epstein's and Ms. Maxwell's alleged sexual abuse of Plaintiff. Defendants did not file 
counterclaims. 
On June 2, 2020, the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands granted the Co-
Executors' motion to establish the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program,' voluntary 
independent program designed to compensate and resolve the claims of victims of sexual abuse 
by Jeffrey Epstein (the "Program"). On June 22, 2020, based on an understanding that Plaintiff 
wished to participate in the Program and that participation could result in the resolution of 
Plaintiff's claims, Judge Freeman stayed this cas…

Open in the interactive archive →