Epstein Project

EFTA00022146.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of New York 
86 Chambers Street 
New York. New York 10007 
January 6, 2020 
By Electronic Mail and U.S. Mail 
Roberta A. Kaplan 
Ka Ian Hecker & Fink LLP 
New York, NY 10118 
Re: 
Request for Information Relating to Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Ms. Kaplan: 
I am the Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") who will be handling the request you 
discussed with AUSA 
for certain information relating to Jeffrey Epstein. Because 
your request seeks information from Department of Justice (the "Department") employees 
acquired as part of their performance of their official duties, your request is governed by certain 
Department regulations—commonly referred to as Touhy regulations—which, inter alia, prohibit 
any Department employee from disclosing such information "without prior approval of the 
proper Department official in accordance with §§ 16.24 and 16.25 of this part." 28 C.F.R. § 
16.22(a); see also United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951); 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 
et seq. The "proper official" in this case is Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for 
the Southern District of New York. The Touhy regulations provide a set of procedures for the 
United States Attorney to follow when considering such requests. See 28 C.F.R. §§ 16.22(b), 
16.24. 
A party seeking to obtain records or employee testimony from the Department must first 
submit a written demand. See 28 C.F.R. § 16.22. To assist the United States Attorney in 
evaluating your request, we ask that this demand provide a detailed statement of the information 
sought; the litigation for which you seek this information; the pertinence of the information 
sought to your litigation; and the availability (or absence) of means in that litigation, including 
discovery, to obtain the information in question. See id. § 16.22(d). 
The U.S. Attorney will reach a determination regarding your request in light of the 
considerations codified at 28 C.F.…

Open in the interactive archive →