Epstein Project

EFTA00021290.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

From: 
To: 
(USANYS)" 
Cc: ' 
(USANYS)"  
Subject: RE: Epstein Victim Impact Statements 
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:30:28 +0000 
SANYS 
On the third question, I think there may have been one or two victims who expressed an interest in attending but didn't 
make it (I recall that 
missed a flight, and I'm not sure if anyone else had issues like that), but I don't believe 
any of those people in particular told us that they wanted to make a statement. 
From: 
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:23 PM 
To: 
(USANYS)
Cc: 
(USANYS) 
Subject: RE: Epstein Victim Impact Statements 
(USANYS) 
For the first question, the AUSAs contacted the attorneys we were aware of who represented victims to tell them that 
their clients were welcome to attend and to make a statement. I believe 
also sent out notifications, and hopefully 
she can tell us how many she sent. 
For the second question, based on my review of the transcript (attached), a total of 17 victims were present at the hearing 
and either spoke at the hearing or had someone read a statement for them. An additional 7 did not attend the hearing 
but had someone else speak for them or read a statement from them. It is possible there were others present who were 
not referenced on the record. 
I don't think we can answer the third question. I don't recall anyone off the top of my head who wanted to attend but 
was unable to, but it's possible there were some in that position. 
From: 
(USANYS) 
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:06 PM 
To: 
< 
Cc: 
(USANYS) 
Subject: FW: Epstein Victim Impact Statements 
Importance: High 
(USANYS) 
Are we able to answer these questions for ODAG quickly? I am sure we can answer the second, and maybe the first ā€” not 
sure about the third. 
From: 
(ODAG) 
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 12:53 PM 
To: 
(USANYS) 
Cc: 
(ODAG) < 
Subject: Epstein Victim Impact Statements 
Importance: High 
EFTA00021290


The Petitioner in the Epstein CVRA case has filed an appeal to the 11th Circuit. One of their iā€¦

Open in the interactive archive ā†’