Epstein Project

EFTA00020541.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

v. Maxwell, — F.Supp.3d — (2018) 
2018 WL 4062649 
Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. 
United States District Court, S.D. New York. 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
Ghislaine MAXWELL, Defendant. 
15 Civ. 7433 
i 
Signed 08/27/2018 
Synopsis 
Background: Following settlement of plaintiff's action for defamation, news media and 
investigative journalist filed motion to intervene, for purposes of filing motion to unseal 
documents that were placed under seal and included in protective order. 
Holdings: The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Sweet, J., 
held that: 
m news media and journalist could intervene in action; 
121 public did not have right of access, either under First Amendment or common law, to 
documents exchanged during discovery that were designated by parties as confidential and made 
part of protective order; 
[3) documents filed in support of motion for summary judgment were "judicial documents" that 
triggered presumption in favor of public's right of access to records; and 
[4) public's presumptive right of access to judicial documents was rebutted by privacy interests 
of parties and multiple non-parties. 
Motion to intervene granted; motion to unseal denied. 
WESTLAW © 2018 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 
1 
EFTA00020541


v. Maxwell, — F.Supp.3d — (2018) 
West Headnotes (31) 
III 
Federal Civil Procedures-Particular Intervenors 
Members of the press and other non-parties, by motion to intervene, may seek to pursue 
modification of confidentiality orders that have led to sealing of documents filed with the 
court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 24. 
Cases that cite this headnote 
1~1 
Federal Civil Proceduree—Time for intervention 
Intervention for the purpose of challenging confidentiality orders is permissible even 
years after a case is closed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 24. 
Cases that cite this headnote 
PI 
Federal Civil Procedure.-Particular Intervenors 
Whether deemed an intervention as of right or permis…

Open in the interactive archive →