Epstein Project

EFTA00020261.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
United States of America, 
—v—
Ghislaine Maxwell, 
Defendant. 
USDC SDNY 
DOCUMENT 
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 
DOC N: 
DATE FILED: 4/16/21 
20-cr-330 (AJN) 
OPINION & ORDER 
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: 
In June 2020, a grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Ghislaine Maxwell 
with facilitating the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minor victims from around 
1994 to 1997. The Government filed a first (S1) superseding indictment shortly thereafter, 
which contained only small, ministerial corrections. The SI superseding indictment included 
two counts of enticement or transportation of minors to engage in illegal sex acts in violation of 
the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two 
counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to 
begin on July 12, 2021. 
Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the Si superseding 
indictment, suppress evidence, and compel discovery. After the parties fully briefed those 
motions, a grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment adding a sex trafficking 
count and another related conspiracy count. 
This Opinion resolves all of Maxwell's currently pending pretrial motions other than 
those seeking to suppress evidence, which the Court will resolve in due course. The motions, and 
this Opinion, deal exclusively with the S 1 superseding indictment and do not resolve any issues 
EFTA00020261


Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 2 of 34 
related to the newly added sex trafficking charges. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies 
Maxwell's motions to dismiss the SI superseding indictment in whole or in part. It grants her 
motion to sever the perjury charges for a separate trial. It denies her motion to further expedite 
discovery. 
…

Open in the interactive archive →