EFTA00019892.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: data-set-8
Extracted text

Kalamata 
Billington Lane 
Derrington 
Stafford 
ST18 9LR 
23 Feb 2020 
To: 
Mel Stride — Chairman of the UK Treasury Select Committee 
Copies To: 
Federal Bureau of Intelligence 
Dame Elizabeth Gloster 
The Press 
Bailey and the TSC Suppressing Key Information to the FBI, PRA, and FCA Regarding the 
.les Staley JP Morgan Emails 
Dear Mr Stride, 
I believe you should have an email from me sent to yourself in particular, and copied to 
members of the Treasury Select Committee on the 22n° of December 2019. I received a reply a 
month later from Maciej Wenerski who handled it as a FOIA, with the obligatory one month grace 
before hitting the send button. 
I shall not repeat myself too much here, but the issue is raised in the public domain now, 
with the FBI, FCA and the PRA all investigating Jes Staley's conduct while working at JP Morgan, 
which ostensibly should disqualify him from holding a senior position in a bank — he was never fit 
to be CEO of Barclays. 
Clearly according the FOIA responses I received from the TSC, the blackmail emails from 
Epstein should have been enough to have had Staley dismissed in 2015, and would give substantial 
context to the emails held by JP Morgan. The TSC has had the Epstein emails now for almost five 
years — and no MP and no civil servant did the honourable thing and demand the FCA investigate. 
Mr Stride, do you take personal responsibility for the TSC witholding key legal evidence to 
ongoing inquiries? Which civil servants in the TSC are involved with the cover-up? Are they 
expecting a role in Barclays after the dust has settled? 
Andrew Bailey of the FCA and Lisa Osofsky of the SFO both explicity refused to 
investigate Staley after I supplied them with FOIA responses. Did the TSC order the FCA and the 
SFO to stand down? It is only the US press that has forced the British establishment's hand. Had 
Staley's role in JP Morgan not been reported there would be no investigation. 
I believe the general public would be correct …
Open in the interactive archive →