EFTA00019183.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: data-set-8
Extracted text

From: 
To:" 
Cc: "<MIElr)" 
 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call 
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 18:13:17 +0000 
(USANYS)" 
No worries. I just dialed in. I don't think anyone is on the line yet. Let me know if you are and I just am not using this 
properly. 
From: 
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 12:03 PM 
To 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call 
(USANYS) 
Apologies, I'm stuck on a call running a few minutes behind, but I'll dial in momentarily. 
Thanks, 
From 
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 12:56 PM 
To: 
c
> 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call 
(USANYS) 
In advance of our call, attached is an article that recently ran locally on this issue: 
From 
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 9:26 AM 
To: 
sc
e 
Cc: 
(USANYS) ‹
> 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call 
I have asked my PIO to find out if there is a deadline on this reporting that will necessitate moving up the timing of this 
call. I will let you know if that turns out to be the case. 
Below are the details for the conference call in number and participant code: 
EFTA00019183


Phone Number: 866-880-0098 
Participant code: 8704649# 
From: 
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 20218:29 AM 
To: 
Cc: 
>;
 (USANYS) 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call 
Thanks for the advanced notice, we should definitely discuss, particularly since there are rules about press contacts in our 
pending case that we're mindful of. 2:15 p.m. works for us. On timing, do you have a sense of when you anticipate this 
happening? 
From: 
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 10:21 AM 
To: 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call 
(USANYS) 
As an FYI, I am really calling to get the contact information for your PIO since there will be reporting in our local news and 
my USA wants to make a statement, but we want to run this by you all and your PIO first. As for time, does 2:15pm ET 
work for you all? If so, I can get a conference line set up for that time. 
H 
From: 
Sent: Wednesda Ma 5 20218:13 AM 
To: 
Cc: 
'c
›; 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call 
H 
(USANYS) 
Since our whole team will join to keep everyone looped in, it woul…
Open in the interactive archive →