EFTA00017042.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: data-set-8
Extracted text

From: ' 
To: Gary Bloxsome 
Cc: ' 
r ‹
> 
Richardson' 
Subject: RE: U.S. Department of Justice investigation 
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:23:11 +0000 
Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg 
Gary, 
You are aware of our position, and we do not believe any further rehashing of our prior conversations is productive at this 
point. That said, we can confirm that it is our standard practice to refrain from publicly commenting on the substance of any 
witness interview, and we intend to abide by that practice in this case. Beyond that, we can make no commitments. Please 
advise as to whether Prince Andrew will agree to be interviewed and, if so, when such interview will take place. 
Regards, 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
Southern District of New York 
From: Gary Bloxsome 
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2020 10:46 
To: 
Cc: 
) < 
; 
Jennifer Richardson 
Subject: Re: U.S. Department of Justice investigation 
DearM 
Thank you for your email of 30 January 2020. 
>; Daniel Cundy 
On 10 January 2020 you personally assured me that any contact between the Duke of York and the DOJ was 
confidential and would remain confidential within the investigation team in the DOJ and FBI. You said: "We don't 
intend to share either the contents or the existence of the conversation beyond our chain of command in the DW. As 
well as our partners at the FBI. It is confidential within the investigation team and our supervisors." The note I made 
of what you said about the confidentiality of the interview process is as follows: "We do not publicise the content or 
existence of any of our interviews. We can't guarantee that anyone might not share it with some other person or it 
might be shared with other individuals who might come to have knowledge of its existence, but our office does not 
advise the press of the interview and doesn't advise other interviewees of the fact the interview has taken place or 
the contents of those discussions. For example, it was reported widely that our office was attempti…
Open in the interactive archive →