Epstein Project

EFTA00016180.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

From: 
To: "I
Cc: "I 
(USANYS)" 
 
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents 
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:21:24 +0000 
Thanks. And definitely get it. I think 
is just trying to be as up-to-date as possible when she raises. 
From: 
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 9:20 AM 
To: 
(USANYS) 
Cc: 
c=las; 
Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents 
I tried using the exe file a couple times and it crashed my computer both times. But I can follow up with FBI. 
And in any event these two devices are a tiny percentage overall, and not the ones we expect may have useful 
evidence in connection with Maxwell — for that we want the servers with old emails, rather than devices 
purchased and used years after Maxwell was out of the picture. 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Jul 6, 2020, at 09:17, 
(USANYS) < 
> wrote: 
Okay, have you asked FBI if they can help? The more recent phone dumps I've gotten require me to open the data using 
a special program that typically comes with the extraction. 
From: 
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 9:17 AM 
To: 
(USANYS) 
Cc: 
) 
Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents 
',l
ust doesn't appear to be a PDF report like we normally see (and like there is for the other device). If 
were around I'd give it to him to decipher, but in terms of what we got, it's not obvious to me where the 
actual data is. 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Jul 6, 2020, at 08:54, 
(USANYS) < 
> wrote: 
Also, what is the issue with the iPhone extraction the FBI gave us — is it a bad extraction? Is it a technology issue? 
is pushing up the chain this morning. Thanks 
From: 
(USANYS) 
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 8:50 AM 
To: 
Cc: 
) 
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents 
EFTA00016180


Just to confirm, this estimate is for everything from both SWs, right? It looks like the attached email contemplates 57 
devices, and it sounds like we're just over 60 at this point, but I assume that's an issue we could resolve with 
pretty easily if need be? 
From: 
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 5:11 PM …

Open in the interactive archive →