EFTA00013750.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: data-set-8
Extracted text

From 
To 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:52:55 +0000 
Importance: Normal 
Thanks 
From: 
Se 
• 
1, 2007 9:52 AM 
To: 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
I 
The agreement says that they will not contest liability as to the girls on our list. Discovery may be 
relevant to the issue of the amount of damages suffered, but not the veracity of the claims. 
From: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:39 PM 
To: Jay Lefkowitz 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
I called Judge Davis before I sent him the agreed upon letter. He indicated his willingness to serve as the "decider" I will 
call him tomorrow to see whether anything has changed and when we can anticipate a decision. Regarding the subpoena 
question, let me think about that overnight. Thanks, 
From: )ay Leflcowilz [milk) 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:54 PM 
To: 
Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Subject: Re: Epstein 
Thanks 
I haven't heard anything from Judge Davis. I assume he is still willing to take on the role you asked him to take on, but can you please 
let me know if that is not the case? 
Also, we are beginning to think about what discovery we may need to take to verify any claims. I am assuming that your office does 
not want to be copied on any subpoenas or anything related to discovery. But please let me know if that is an incorrect assumption. 
Thanks - Jay 
EFTA00013750


From: 
Sent: I 
To: Jay Lefkowitz 
Cc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" < 
Subject: Epstein 
Jay, 
Here is an executed version of the addendum. Please Fed Ex the original signature pages to me. Thanks, 
«epstein addendum 10 30.pdf» 
******* *********************** 
***************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly…
Open in the interactive archive →