Epstein Project

EFTA00010414.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 310 Filed 07/02/21 Page 1 of 3 
COHEN & GRESSER LLP 
000 Third Amnia 
New York NY 10022 
Christian R. Evcrdcll 
July 2, 2021 
BY ECF 
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan 
United States District Court 
Southern District of New York 
United States Courthouse 
40 Foley Square 
New York, NY 10007 
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) 
Dear Judge Nathan: 
We respectfully submit this letter to bring to the Court's attention the recent decision by 
the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. William Henry Cosby 
Jr., J-100-2020 (Jun. 30, 2021), in which the Court vacated Mr. Cosby's conviction and sentence 
because the District Attorney's Office that prosecuted him failed to live up to its express promise 
not to prosecute Mr. Cosby for the same crimes for which he was later convicted.' Ms. Maxwell's 
case presents a similar situation. As we argued in our supplemental pretrial motions currently 
pending before the Court (Dkt. 293), the government has failed to abide by its promise not to 
prosecute Ms. Maxwell for the offenses for which she was immunized by the Epstein Non-
Prosecution Agreement ("NPA"). We submit that this decision provides support for Ms. 
Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss Counts One, Three, Five, and Six of the S2 Indictment 
for violation of the NPA. 
In Cosby, Andrea Constand alleged that Mr. Cosby sexually assaulted her in his residence 
in January 2004. (Op. 4-5). Ms. Constand did not immediately report the assault to law 
enforcement authorities and continued to have contact with Mr. Cosby in the following months. 
(Id. at 5-7). In January 2005, approximately one year after the assault, Ms. Constand reported Mr. 
Cosby's conduct to the police. (Id. at 6). The Montgomery County District Attorney's Office 
investigated the allegations, but then-District Attorney Bruce Castor determined that "there was 
insufficient credible and admissible evidence" to bring criminal cha…

Open in the interactive archive →