Epstein Project

EFTA00010351.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

From: 
To: '
r dl 
Subject: RE: documents for Relativity 
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 23:30:42 +0000 
Importance: Normal 
Great — thanks very much. 
From: 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 11:56 
To: 
Cc: 
) 
> 
Subject: RE: documents for Relativity 
All of the data has been loaded to Relativity and is available for review. Please let me know if there are any questions. 
Thank you. 
From: 
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 11:36 AM 
To: 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: documents for Relativity 
> 
We've received some additional documents in this same production we'd like to include in the same general subfolder on 
Relativity ("BSF second production" under "BSF returns"►, please. I'm sending them in a separate folder link so that they 
don't mess up your process with the initial results; they're here: 
Usa.doj.gov\ clouANYS StAndrews \Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 InvestigationUt 2018 SDNY investigation \Subpoena 
Returns \ Boies Schiller\ 2019-04-23 Boies Schiller second subpoena response (follow-up) 
Please note there are a few things from that folder that do NOT need to be uploaded — the folder titled "!Original Zips" 
and the two PDF documents (in the main folder) don't need to go onto Relativity. And I think I neglected to give similar 
info for the original folder linked to below ("2019-04-18, Boies Schiller second subpoena response") — in that folder, we do 
not need the "!Original Zips" folder or its contents, and do not need the three PDF documents in the main folder to be 
uploaded. 
As always, please let me know if any questions or issues, and thanks very much. 
From: 
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 15:55 
To: 
EFTA00010351


Cc: 
) 
 
> 
Subject: RE: documents for Relativity 
We can keep the folder structure that currently exists. If I have any questions regarding the documents I will let you 
know. 
Thank you. 
From: 
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 3:51 PM 
To: 
Cc: 
) 
Subject: RE: documents for Relativity 
> 
Following up on the below, and for the same case — US v. Epstein (USAO…

Open in the interactive archive →