753.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: house-oversight-doj
Pages: 264
Text status: Searchable text available
OCR confidence: 0.9092336483925578
Extracted text

be No Ww ws Ol OY ~] oe) WO   a ie) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 1 of 264 1423 LC 7VMAX1   iD STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK a Z =                           G Z =   ‘iD STATES OF AMERICA, Vv. 20 CR 330 (AJN)   GHISLAINE MAXWELL,         Defendant. Jury Trial   New York, N.Y. December 7, 2021 9:05 a.m. Before: HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge APPEARANCES DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: MAURENE COMEY ALISON MOE LARA POMERANTZ ANDREW ROHRBACH Assistant United States Attorneys HADDON MORGAN AND FOREMAN Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA LAURA A. MENNINGER -and-— BOBBI C. STERNHEIM -and-— COHEN & GRESSER BY: CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL           Also Present: Amanda Young, FBI Paul Byrne, NYPD Sunny Drescher, Paralegal, U.S. Attorney's Office Ann Lundberg, Paralegal, Haddon Morgan and Foreman SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300   DOJ-OGR-00013014 

be NO (ee) ws Ol OY ~] co Ne}   20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 264 1424 LC 7VMAX1 (Trial resumed; jury not present) TH ma   COURT: Matters to take up. MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Go ahead, Ms. Menninger.           MS. MENNINGER: We learned early this morning through     a disclosure by the government that they have spoken with witness Brian. THE COURT: I'm sorry, could you pull up the mic closer please. Thank you. MS. MENNINGER: That they had spoken with witness Brian, who was anticipated to testify today. Brian is the brother of witness Jane. THE COURT: Correct. MS. MENNINGER: You may recall, your Honor, we had litigation around prior consistent statements; and that Brian is being offered in part to report supposedly prior consistent statements with Jane. We had discussions about whether Jane would be subject to recall in order to be questioned about those particular prior consistent statements, should they be admitted. What w…
Open in the interactive archive →