Epstein Project

621.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
house-oversight-doj
Pages
51
Text status
Searchable text available
OCR confidence
0.939412940485723

Original source

Extracted text

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page1of51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Rigs S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant.   THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S OMNIBUS POST-TRIAL MOTIONS DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York One St. Andrew’s Plaza New York, New York 10007 Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys Of Counsel DOJ-OGR-00009563 

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page2of51 Table of Contents PRELIMINARY STATEMENT cscsssscmscnsoonaxncsacemecnRERREERORR RENNER 2 LEGAL, STANDARD ss: ssscccses senses ssseasavs sutcansascnceans ancscss ss cwscans saneens ss unswais canes a neceneasaneiN sa veeae aRKINS 2 FEIN I xeeesncncameneemnmerennmasctensnniesc west sien PKS NN NL A ND 3 I. The Defendant Was Convicted of the Crimes Charged in the Indictment, So No Constructive Amendment or Variance OCCUITE........ eee ceeeceeeeeeeeeeseeceeceseeeeeeesaeecsaecnaeeeeeeesaeeenaeenes 3 Ae OC eo 4 B. DISCUSSION ..........::ccecceesseeeseceeeeeseeeeseecsaeceseeeseeecaeecnaecuseeeseeecaaeceaesueeessaeecsaecnaeeneeeesaeessaeenes 6 Il. The Court Should Enter Judgment on Counts Three and Five .......... ce ceeeeseeeeereeeeeeeeeenees 24 A. Applicable Law... ececceccssessecesesseeeseeseeeseesaecneecaeesaeesneeseseaeenaecaeesaeeeneveseaeenaeenaeeats 25 B. DISCUSSION 00... eee eceeseeeeeseceesecseesecseeseesaecaeeaecseesecsaesecsaesaesaecaevaeesaesecsaeseeaesaesaeeaeeaeenes 26 Ill. The Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Her Conviction and Dismiss the Indictment Based on Alleged Improper Pre-Trial Delay Should Be Denied... cece eeseeseeereeeeeeseeeseeneesneeeeeeeneeeenaees 33 A. The Defendant Has Failed to Demonstrate Actual and Substantial Prejudice .......... 34 B. The Defendant Has Failed to Establish that the Government Delayed the Indictment for an Improper PUrpOSe ...........eeeeeesee…

Open in the interactive archive →