480.pdf
- Type
- pdf
- Source set
- house-oversight-doj
- Pages
- 9
- Text status
- Searchable text available
- OCR confidence
- 0.9206512353969885
Original source
Extracted text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 480 Filed 11/21/21 Page1of9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Vv. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. MS. MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING A SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P 17(c)(3) Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York, NY 10007 Phone: 212-243-1100 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ-OGR- 00007358
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 480 Filed 11/21/21 Page2of9 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell requests that the Court enter an Order authorizing her counsel to issue a subpoena under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c) to Jordana H. Feldman, Administrator, Epstein Victim’s Compensation Program, for certain items identified in Attachment A to the proposed Subpoena, together attached as Exhibit 1 to this Motion, for the following reasons: I. Background On October 11, 2021, the government began producing 3500 material to the defense. These rolling productions confirmed that the four Accusers referenced in the indictment applied for and received millions of dollars from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Ms. Maxwell requests the Court’s assistance in subpoenaing documents submitted by the Accusers and the witnesses for use at trial. The documents should be returned to this Court for an in camera review and, subject to the Court’s review, disclosed to the defense to be used for impeachment of the witnesses at trial. Il. Legal Standard Rule 17(c) permits subpoenas compelling the production of “books, papers, documents, data, or other objects” prior to trial. Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c)(1). Most district courts in the Second Circuit, including this Court, apply the analysis set forth in United States v. …
Open in the interactive archive →