456.pdf
- Type
- pdf
- Source set
- house-oversight-doj
- Pages
- 10
- Text status
- Searchable text available
- OCR confidence
- 0.9342286850110164
Original source
Extracted text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 456 Filed 11/12/21 Page1of10 > U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 12, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in support of the admission of certain statements by the defendant’s co-conspirators at trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E). Consistent with the Court’s directives at the November 1, 2021 conference in this case, the Government has provided the defense with categories of co-conspirator statements it intends to offer at trial, as well as examples of particular statements within each category. After conferral, the defense indicated that, subject to certain clarifications, it would not object to the majority of the proffered statements. The defense further indicated that it objected to a particular subset of the Government’s proffered statements. For the reasons set forth below, the Court should admit these statements at trial. A. The Proffered Statements The Government identified four categories of statements by co-conspirators of the defendant that the Government may seek to admit at trial: (1) statements made by Epstein to friends and family of Minor Victims; (2) statements made by Epstein to his employees; (3) statements made by a co-conspirator to the Minor Victims or their families; and (4) statements made by DOJ-OGR-00006953
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 456 Filed 11/12/21 Page2of10 Page 2 Epstein to the Minor Victims or in their presence. In addition, the Government provided specific exemplars of statements falling within each of these four categories. The Government explained that it expected many of the statements f…
Open in the interactive archive →