389.pdf
- Type
- pdf
- Source set
- house-oversight-doj
- Pages
- 11
- Text status
- Searchable text available
- OCR confidence
- 0.8748883597908775
Original source
Extracted text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 389 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page1ofi1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee ee a nn 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Vv. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF MS. MAXWELL’S ALLEGED FALSE STATEMENTS AND TO REDACT ALLEGATIONS RELATED TO THE PERJURY COUNTS FROM THE SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York, NY 10007 Phone: 212-243-1100 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ-OGR- 00005702
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 389 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page2ofi1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page BACKGROUND 1.0... ceceeceeseseensesseseeseeseeneesecneesecsaesaesaesnesaecnevsecneesesnaeseesaesaeaecneeaeenaeensnaeseeaeeaeeatens 1 ARGUMENT 1.0... cceceesessessseseeseeseenseenensessesaecsevsecseeseenseseesaesaesaecaeesessseseesaeeaesaeeaeeaeeneeeeenaeeseaeseteaeenees 3 I. The Court Should Exclude Evidence Related to the Perjury Counts and Redact Those Allegations from the Superseding Indictment................ccccceseeeeeeeeeeeeeeceeeeeteeesneeeaees fe) CONCLUSION ......ecececcceseeeeseeseeseenseseenseenessecaeeaecneesecsseseesaeeaeaecaeesecnaesnseaecaesaecaeeaeeneeeeenaeeessaeenteatens 6 DOJ-OGR-00005703
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 389 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page3of11 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Grunewald vy. United States, 353 U.S. 391 (1957)... .ceccesccssesscesseeeseesecesecsaeeseesaeeceessesaecsaecaeecaeseeesesuaecsaesneecaeeseeseeessesnaeeaeaes 5,6 United States v. Halper, 590 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1978).....ccccecceseesscsseeseeeseeseeeseeesecnaecseeeaeeeeeesesesesnaecneecaesssesseseaeenaeenseeaes 1,2 United States v. Marcus Schloss & Co., Inc., PLE Fs Reena n SA ET Fe, LPI oe canne…
Open in the interactive archive →