228.pdf
- Type
- pdf
- Source set
- house-oversight-doj
- Pages
- 1
- Text status
- Searchable text available
- OCR confidence
- 0.8714285714285714
Original source
Extracted text
Casest:2@Cr0032E3PABN Docunrentt22 Hite@4212 PRage afdf 1 800 Third Avenue COHEN & GRESSER LLP a Now ork, NY 10022 USDC SDNY BT pesseccom DOCUMENT Christian R. Everdell FLECTRONICALLY FILED +1 (212) 957-7600 DOC #: [email protected] DATE FILED: 4/2 1/2021 April 21, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Pursuant to the Court’s Opinion and Order, dated April 16, 2021 (Dkt. 207), we write to inform the Court that the defense agrees that Ms. Maxwell’s motion to dismiss the $1 superseding indictment on the grounds that it was returned by a grand jury sitting at the White Plains courthouse (Dkt. 125) is now moot in light of the fact that a grand jury sitting in Manhattan returned the $2 superseding indictment. The motion to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment on nen the grounds that it was returned by a grand jury sitting at the White Plains courthouse (Dkt. No. 125) is DENIED /s/ Christian Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor ; New York, New York 10022 . te (212) 957-7600 ‘ 4/21/2021 SO ORDERED. ALISON |. NATHAN, U.S.D.J. DOJ-OGR-00003921
Open in the interactive archive →