142.pdf
- Type
- pdf
- Source set
- house-oversight-doj
- Pages
- 38
- Text status
- Searchable text available
- OCR confidence
- 0.922651412295231
Original source
Extracted text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 142 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee ee ee ee = = = + ».4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) V. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. pee eee X MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: 212-243-1100 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ-OGR-00002573
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 142 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........ccccccccssesscssessesseeseesecseesecseesecsaessesaecseesecneesecsaeseeaecaenaecneeseeneens 1 SCATHMBNT (OP PACTS canes ames a A A AG TTT MARRS 7 A. The Structure of the NPA oo... .eceeeceesessecssecseecseesseeseessecaecsaecaeesseeseeseeseseaeeeaeenaeeaes 8 B. The Negotiation of the NPA ......c.ccccccccecssecssecssecessecsseeeeeesseecssecnseeneeeeseecnseenseeeseee 11 ARGUMENT .....ccccceccesccssecseeeseesecesecsaecsaecneeeaeeseeesecaecsaecneeeaeeseeeseseaecsaecneeeaeeseeesesenecnaeenaesneesaeeseees 12 I. The Indictment Should Be Dismissed for Breach of the NPA. .......ccceeeeseeseeseerereeees 14 A. Ms. Maxwell Has Standing to Enforce the NPA. .......ccceescesecseeseeseeeseeeeetteeenees 15 B. The NPA’s Prohibition on Prosecution of Potential Co-Conspirators Is Not Limited to the SDFL. ....ccccccceccccesessecssecssecseesseesecesecsaecaesneeseeeseesseesaecsaesneeeaeeneeenaee 18 1. The NPA is binding on the USAO in this District... cece eneeeeeneeee 18 2. United States v. Annabi does not alter the analysis. .........cccsceseeseeeseeeeeees 19 a. There is an “affirmative appearance” that the c…
Open in the interactive archive →