103-02.pdf

Type

pdf

Source set

house-oversight-doj

Pages

4

Text status

Searchable text available

OCR confidence

0.9394869952608315

Original source

Extracted text

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 103-2 Filed 12/23/20 Page 1 of 4 Exhibit B DOJ-OGR- 00002226 

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 103-2 Filed 12/23/20 Page 2 of 4 IN THE MATTER OF AN OPINION ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL ADDENDUM OPINION 1. | This Addendum Opinion is provided in response to the Government’s Memorandum in Opposition to the Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Release dated 16 December 2020, insofar as it pertains to matters of English extradition law and practice. 2. The primary conclusions of the Opinion dated 8 October 2020 (‘the Opinion’) remain unchanged, namely: (a) in the majority of cases, proceedings in England and Wales in relation to US extradition requests are concluded in under two years; (b) it is virtually certain that bail would be refused in an extradition case in circumstances where the requested person had absconded from criminal proceedings in the United States prior to trial and in breach of bail; and (c) on the basis of the information currently known, it is highly unlikely’ that Ghislaine Maxwell would be able successfully to resist extradition to the United States in relation to the charges in the superseding indictment dated 7 July 2020. In addition to those conclusions, the following three points may be made. 3. First, as noted in the Opinion’, Ms Maxwell’s waiver of extradition would be admissible in any extradition proceedings in England and Wales. While such a document cannot compel a requested person to consent to their extradition once in the United Kingdom, the document would be a highly relevant factor in any contested extradition proceedings. In particular: (a) If Ms Maxwell were to rely on such a waiver to secure bail in the United States and then, having absconded, renege on the undertakings in that ' The Government observes, at p.16 of the Motion, that this leaves open a “possibility” that extradition could be resisted. Absolute certainty in any legal context is rare but the practical effec…

Open in the interactive archive →