Epstein Project

20250728111721067_24-1073ReplyInSupportOfPetitionForWritOfCertiorari.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
house-oversight-doj
Pages
14
Text status
Searchable text available
OCR confidence
0.9366831789355672

Original source

Extracted text

No. 24-1073 IN THE Supreme Court of the Gnited States GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Petitioner, Vv. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI DAVID OSCAR MARKUS Counsel of Record MoNA MARKUS MARKUS/Moss PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 (305) 379-6667 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner July 28, 2025 EEE) WILSON-EPES PRINTING Co., INC. — (202) 789-0096 — WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 DOJ-OGR- 00000242 

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ccc eeeeeseeceeeee ii REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION .... 1 I. The government concedes that the circuits are split as to whether a promise on behalf of the “United States” by a United States Attorney’s office in one district is binding upon other districts. ... 2 II. The Second Circuit’s decision below is wrong and violates the principles set forth in this Court’s prior opinions. ......... 4 III. This case is an ideal vehicle for resolving the split over this important and YECULTINE QUESTION. ...........cseeeeesseeeeeeeeeeeeees 11 CONCLUSION .........ccceecccccccccceeeeesesssneeeeeeeeeeseeees 11 (i) DOJ-OGR-00000243 

i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Prisco v. United States, 562 U.S. 1290 (2011), No. 10-7895 Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971). eee Thomas v. INS, 35 F.3d 1332 (9th Cir. 1994).......... United States v. Andreas, 216 F.3d 645 (7th Cir. 2000).......... United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985)........... United States v. Carmichael, 216 F.3d 224 (2d Cir. 2000)........... Page(s) sesssessee 4,6 eseeessees 10 United States v. Florida West Intl Airways, 853 F.Supp.2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) ....... 10 United States v. Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir. 1999)........ United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d. Cir. 2024)......... OTHER AUTHORITIES Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Leg…

Open in the interactive archive →