EFTA00034652.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: data-set-8
Extracted text

totally. i wonder if, was mbarr s d/introspective seeing 
response like that. this is b/c of epstein. he was on SW but in regular 
clothes on legal visit and 
questioned it. i told 
when she asked that we have done it this way in the past. in light of the 
huge scar on epstein's neck (granted a ton of ambiguity surrounding the incident), he did need to be on SW yesterday. i guess we 
should have declined his legal visit if we were following this other chiefs advice 
>» 
7/24/2019 8:40 AM >>> 
lol i love this guy's response. that if this is even a question, they probably shouldn't even be on watch. we put way too many people on 
there. I'm even seeing the difference in BRO. they just don't function that way. guys come here from MCC and go to SHU, and tell staff 
they want to go on SW, and the staff laugh at them, and the inmates tell them they were able to get on watch that way at MCC. and 
the psych who responded to her is at Chicago, another detention center. so, I'm guessing they see a lot of the same things that we do, 
and probably use SW less as an option. 
CONFIDENTIAL 
SDNY_000 11856 
EFTA00034652
Open in the interactive archive →