EFTA00032725.pdf
- Type
- pdf
- Source set
- data-set-8
Original source
Extracted text
From: '
(USANYS)" ci
To: '
(USANYS)"
Cc: '
(USANYS)"
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:53:25 +0000
Attachments: Ex._C_Sealed.pdf
From:
(USANYS) <
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM
To:
(USANYS)
Cc:
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S?
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM
To:
(USANYS) <
Cc:
I (USANYS)
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
In the spirit of completeness, I'm also attaching their replies.
From:
(USANYS) <
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM
To:
(USANYS)
Cc:
(USANYS)
Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
<
>;
Goodness!
Associate U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
On Jun 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM,
(USANYS) <
(USANYS) <
(USANYS) <
wrote:
She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that
over the last few years.
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM
To:
(USANYS) <
EFTA00032725
Cc:
(USANYS) <I
>;
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
(USANYS) <
Dumb Q: why does Maxwell have two memos of law?
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:19 PM
To:
(USANYS) <
Cc:
(USANYS) <
M>;
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
(USANYS) <
Per our discussion, I am attaching: (1) Maxwell's two briefs raising the suppression argument; (2) the transcript of the
McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (see pp 59-115); and (4) the exhibits we attached to our
motion (Ex 4-7). Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions "at a later time" ahead of trial.
Thanks very much.
From:
(USANYS) <
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:09 AM
To:
(USANYS)
Cc:
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Question re AM/Maxwell Suppression…
Open in the interactive archive →