EFTA00031202.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: data-set-8
Extracted text

From: '• 
(USANYS)" 
To: 
laNYS)" < 
(USANYS)" 
C c:  I 
II 
I 
II 
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) 
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 19:44:58 +0000 
Attachments: 2021-10-15_GM_Ietter re_MDCJegal_mail_Final.docx 
and 
signed off on the letter. Attaching what we plan to file. 
From: 
(USANYS) 
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:04 PM 
To: 
(USANYS)<
> 
Cc: 
(USANYS) 
> 
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell 52 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) 
Ah-1 see the highlights now. Agree. 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Oct 15, 2021, at 1:49 PM, 
(USANYS) ‹
> wrote: 
I think this is good but would delete the highlighted sentences. I agree with not engaging on footnote. 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Oct 15, 2021, at 1:29 PM, 
(USANYS) 
wrote: 
Attached is a draft response due today at 5 pm. We still need to send this letter to and 
at the 
MDC to review for accuracy. Do you think you will be able to review shortly or should I send them this draft 
simultaneously? We highlighted some language for your consideration about Judge Nathan's deadlines, happy to 
discuss. We haven't engaged with the defense's footnote 1 about the volume of the materials delivered because that 
is a little more complicated and we want to make sure any representations are fully accurate, but happy to discuss. 
Thanks, 
From: 
(USANYS) 
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 10:30 AM 
To: 
(USANYS) 
< 
(USANYS) 
> 
Cc: 
<
>; 
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell 52 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) 
EFTA00031202


Thanks. (We've really got to talk to Nathan about these deadlines!) 
From: 
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 10:30 AM 
To: 
(USANYS) 
(USANYS) 
> 
> 
Cc: 
<->; 
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell 52 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) 
(usANys) C
).; 
Hi 
Judge Nathan just ordered us to respond to this letter as soon as possible but no later than 5 pm today. We've 
reached out to BOP to set up a call. 
Thanks, 
From: 
(USANYS) 
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 8:31 PM 
To: 
(USANYS) 
Cc: 
) < 
>; 
>; 
(USANYS) 
Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v.…
Open in the interactive archive →