Epstein Project

EFTA00030569.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of New York 
By Electronic Mail 
Christian Everdell, Esq. 
Mark Cohen, Esq. 
Cohen & Gresser LLP 
800 Third Avenue 
New York, NY 10022 
Laura Menninger, Esq. 
Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. 
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 
150 East Tenth Avenue 
Denver, CO 80203 
Dear Counsel: 
The Silvio J. Mono Building 
One Saint Andrew's Plaza 
New York. New York 10007 
October 28, 2020 
Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. 
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 
33 West 19th Street-4th Fl. 
New York, NY 10007 
Re: 
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) 
We write in response to your letter of October 13, 2020 setting forth "requests for 
discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and 
Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of 
Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable." The letter lists 22 specific requests 
(the "Requests"). The letter also makes a general request for materials pursuant to Brady v. 
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995), followed by 10 "specific 
Brady requests." 
As an initial matter, we take seriously our disclosure obligations, including those arising 
under Rule 16, Brady and its progeny, and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and its 
progeny, and we intend to comply fully with those obligations. We intend to do so irrespective of 
whether you specifically request such material, or how you characterize that material. Indeed, as 
you are aware, we have already made substantial productions pursuant to Rule 16 and otherwise 
in this case. The Government will continue to fulfill all of its obligations going forward. 
However, your unilateral assertion that particular items constitute "Brady materials" does 
not itself render those materials subject to disclosure, let alone immediate disclosure some nine 
months before trial. To the contrary, a …

Open in the interactive archive →