EFTA00030069.pdf

Type: pdf
Source set: data-set-8
Extracted text

From: 
)"
To: a(USANYS)” 
 
Cc: 
(USANYS)"
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed 
Redactions in Omnibus Response 
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:56:11 +0000 
Attachments: PROPOSED_REDACT1ONS - 
2021.02.26 Government Omnibus_Opposition to Maxwell Defense Motions FINAL.pd 
>, 
Attached. 
From: 
(USANYS) c 
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 2:54 PM 
To: 
>; 
USANYS) 
Cc: 
) 
<
).; 
(USANYS) < 
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response 
Thanks. When you can would you mind sending us our proposed redactions to pages 1-128? 
From: 
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 2:01 PM 
To: 
(USANYS)
Cc: 
<
)'; 
cza 
) 
(USANYS)< 
Subject: FW: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response 
FYI 
From: Laura Menninger <ImenningerPhmflaw.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:08 PM 
To: 
Cc: 
(USANYS) 
>; 
>, I 
I c 
; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' 
; Jeff Pagliuca 
Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP 
Subject: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response 
Dear Judge Nathan — 
Pursuant to Rule 2(B) of the Court's individual rules, attached is a letter setting forth Ms. Maxwell's objections to the 
redactions proposed by the government to their Omnibus Response and Exhibit 5. Also attached are exhibits setting forth 
Ms. Maxwell's proposed redactions. 
Best regards, 
Laura A. Menninger 
EFTA00030069


Laura A. Menninger I Partner 
Haddon, Mor an & Foreman, P.C. 
Denver, CO 80203 
EFTA00030070
Open in the interactive archive →