EFTA00029742.pdf
- Type
- pdf
- Source set
- data-set-8
Original source
Extracted text
From:
-
To:"
Cc: '
"
, "
"
Subject: Re: MCC New York (Procedural Review)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:27:08 +0000
Me too
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 14, 2020, at 10:22 AM,
I think 2:30 works forMnd I.
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:22 AM
To:
I
>
Subject: RE: MCC New York (Procedural Review)
Both work for me.
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:16 AM
To:
>
Subject: RE: MCC New York (Procedural Review)
> wrote:
<
=>
I just realized that I may have pick-up responsibilities tonight. Could we do 2:30 instead?
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:15 AM
To:
(
)
I
cfl
Subject: RE: MCC New York (Procedural Review)
How about 4:30?
EFTA00029742
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 9:49 AM
To:
<
)<
<
>
Subject: RE: MCC New York (Procedural Review)
Thanks. Rough 24 hours, but good to be back. What works for you guys today? Aside from something at 2, I think
and I are pretty flexible.
From:
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:36 PM
To:
>;
Subject: RE: MCC New York (Procedural Review)
C
Let's discuss both issues tomorrow when
is back. (feel better soon!)
From:
)
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:22 PM
To:
>;
Subject: RE: MCC New York (Procedural Review)
Yes, just start drafting. I think the lawyer will then review what they have. If any holes are identified that require
further interviews or other fact-finding, they will be in touch with us before doing so. But it may make sense to have a
conversation with
to get his understanding as well.
From:
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:19 PM
To:
C
>;
Subject: RE: MCC New York (Procedural Review)
C
On the report, we can chat when
is back tomorrow — but when you say start the report, do you just mean start
drafting? Is it contemplated that they will do further interviews beyond what have been done for the criminal case?
Any sense of timing?
Nand I discussed the BOP Board of Inquiry with
id are going to follow up with
— happy to discuss.
EFTA00029743
…
Open in the interactive archive →