Epstein Project

EFTA00029590.pdf

Type
pdf
Source set
data-set-8

Original source

Extracted text

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 331 Filed 08/30/21 Page 1 of 5 
HADDON 
MORGAN 
FOREMAN 
August 30, 2021 
VIA ECF 
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan 
United States District Court 
Southern District of New York 
40 Foley Square 
New York, NY 10007 
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman. P.0 
Jeffrey Fag!loco 
www.hmflow.corn 
[email protected] 
Re: 
Response to Government Letter dated August 18, 2021, Dkt. 320, United States v. 
Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) 
Dear Judge Nathan, 
I write in response to the government's letter dated August 18, 2021, Dkt. 320, which 
raises two issues.' 
Identities of Co-Conspirators 
The government first attempts to walk back its multiple concessions regarding disclosure 
of the identities of the unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment. 
As this Court noted, Ms. Maxwell has on at least two occasions requested such 
disclosure. Dkt. 317 at 12 n.1 (citing Dkt. 291 and Dkt. 293). Only after this Court ordered 
disclosure of the identities of the unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment did the 
government finally object. The government's objection comes too late. 
' As directed by the Court, on August 24 the parties conferred about the government's 
letter, but they were unable to reach an agreement on the government's requests for 
reconsideration. 
EFTA00029590


Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 331 Filed 08/30/21 Page 2 of 5 
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan 
August 30, 2021 
Page 2 
The government's objection is, in substance, a motion to reconsider. "There is `no 
specific rule, either in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or in this district's local criminal 
rules that provide for reconsideration of a ruling in a criminal matter.' United States v. 
Okparaeke, No. 17-CR-225 (NSR), 2019 WL 4233427, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 6, 2019) (quoting 
United States v. Cartagena, No. 10 Cr. 222-2, 2012 WL 2958175, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 20, 
2012)). Even so, courts have discretion to reconsider prior rulings in criminal cases whe…

Open in the interactive archive →